Feed on
Posts
Comments

The following writing was a critical response for my AHIS 333: Win Lose or Draw: Interplays of Theory, Practice and Technology class at Emily Carr based on a piece displayed in the 2008 summer art exhibit at the Vancouver Art Gallery, and about an artist who I think deserves to be mentioned more. This was previously posted on my myspace page, which I am removing in an effort to consolidate my pages.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Credit Long Due for an Animation Innovator


Intricately cut-out black paper figures, fading with age, with joints held together by tiny twisted wires seem inconspicuous under their glass display case at the Vancouver Art Gallery as part of the “Krazy! The Delirious World of Anime + Comics + Video Games + Art” exhibit. It is hard to connect these fragile flat objects with the incredibly emotive animated characters in a movie playing on an adjacent screen. This is the work of German artist Lotte Reiniger, who directed and animated the feature length tale “The Adventures of Prince Achmed” (1926). In an industry that is still male-dominated, she not only stands out as the first notable female animation director, but she is credited with creating the first feature-length animated film, ten years before Disney came out with it’s hit success “Snow White” (1937). Additionally, for this film she utilized a multi-plane camera technique, in which several glass movable layers under the camera were used to separate the foreground from the background. It is remarkable to note that this technique was implemented years before the Fleischer Studios utilized a similar technique for their animated films such as “Poor Cinderella” (1934) and before Disney, who often takes the credit for its invention, used a multi-plane camera in their aforementioned first feature film. Arguably, the Disney Company’s device was far more developed, but Reiniger and her team of collaborators pioneered the concept and most likely inspired its creation.

With all of these compelling facts, I question why I have only recently heard of this artist after four years of Visual Arts study. Perhaps Reiniger’s lack of representation is due to the reality that she was a female director in a patriarchal time or perhaps due to how the United States and Canada has focused on their own home-grown talent. A further conclusion to her absence in the North American educational system or mass media could be to the onset preference and development of cell-animation techniques in the early 20th century. Cut-out animation at the time was considered inferior to this new technology.

One may question my interest in such an arcane form of animation given that my focus is on 3D animation. Yet, as the “Krazy” show co-curator and animation film director Tim Johnson has so succinctly explained “in spite of the very limited technique [in "The Adventures of Prince Achmed"]… you are as emotionally drawn to the story as you are to the most sophisticated contemporary computer-animated films” (100). In the end it comes down to the reality that 3d programs are just another medium to visually express an artist’s vision. The success of the end product created through this relatively new process depends on the imagination of the artist or group of artists. Similar to how the advent of photography into mainstream culture was received both with excitement and at the same time fear that painting was as a result dead, 3D computer animation has been equally praised for bringing animation to a new level as it has been criticized for destroying the art form.

This is related to the main over-arching theme of the “Krazy” exhibit. Where do we draw the line about what is considered art? Where do such forms as video games, comic books and anime fit in? Since computer animation is not created by hand and lacks a tactile response to the character or form that the animator is bringing to life, is it not a respectable form of animation?

I believe that the new medium of 3D programs used for animation functions to open up the realm of possibilities for visual expression and we are just seeing a glimpse of what it can offer. As the programs become more advanced and artist-friendly, it will be easier to match exactly what is envisioned. However, the practitioners of this medium can still learn from the great animation predecessors. As demonstrated in Reiniger’s films, a more focused style of characterization can be just as effective to express a story. At a time where the 3D art form is moving closer towards photo-realism, 3D animators should take a step back and consider if this a more effective way to realize their vision and tell their story.

Works Cited

Johnson, Tim. “Lotte Reinger.” Krazy!: the delirious world of anime + comics + video games + art. Vancouver: Douglas & MacIntyre Ltd., 2008

——————————————————————————————————————————————————–

There are youtube videos that exist of her films, but they do not do her any justice and I highly recommend watching them on the big screen or from a DVD. You can order a copy from Amazon at: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0000714B2?ie=UTF8&tag=karasflamenpa-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=B0000714B2

Tags: , , ,

Below is an essay I wrote while enrolled at Emily Carr University analyzing one of my favourite films, Pan’s Labyrinth.

MHIS: Reading the Screen
November 12, 2007

Dramatic Costuming and Acting
Heighten the Story in Pan’s Labyrinth

Pan’s Labyrinth (2006) is a stunning film which not only contributes originality to the genre of fantasy but also uses dramatic and memorable imagery to convey its story. In the history of cinema, fairytale movies have been traditionally light in terms of portraying characters as overtly frightening or violent. Viewers used to these conventions of the genre will find the use of horrifying imagery in this film shocking. However, traditional fables and legends told to children in the past few centuries have been not been so sanitized. Their purpose was to instill caution and fear into children to prevent them from potential harm. For example, some tales would depict lake monsters that would grab and pull children into the depths and devour them. This was to keep children from carelessly playing around the water and drowning. Tales of forest monsters and witches, such as the well known fable Hansel and Gretel, were told to keep children from straying too far into the forest to potentially get lost or even killed by a wild animal.

A prevalent theme throughout this film is the constant interspersion of the real world and the fantasy. The filmmaker, Guillermo del Toro, juxtaposes scenes of the horrific reality of his character Ofelia’s new surroundings with the equally as frightening scenes of fantasy. This leads the audience to question if the fantasy world is real or not. We may ponder, is the world simply manifested in Sophia’s mind to cope with her mother’s condition and her new stepfather’s cruelty? Or is she indeed a princess, who at the end finds safety and happiness in her kingdom? In an attempt to reveal these answers, a couple of memorable scenes in Pan’s Labyrinth can be analyzed in terms of the arresting costuming design and acting.

The first scene of analysis is one where Ofelia sets out on her mission to obtain the knife in the Pale Man’s den. Dressed in pajamas, a sleeping robe and slippers with her short girlish wavy hair set back in clips, she embodies the innocence of youth. Yet we wonder if what she is wearing in this scene signifies that she is dreaming of the event. With an expression of quiet determination that contrasts her previous shy nature, she wanders through the tunnel towards the frightening monster. The cool green tone of Ofelia’s outfit sets her apart from the scene and the Pale Man. A motif throughout the film, the fantasy world mainly consists of a warm colour palette (Toro).

Surprisingly, she first looks at him not out of fear but with an expression of curiosity as she examine s his eyeballs on the platter, the explicit mural on the wall detailing his nature and the pile of shoes of the deceased. While she is searching for the knife, the Pale Man continues to sits there in the background, inert. This lack of movement increases the tension and suspense of the scene. After Ofelia inevitably is tempted to eat a fruit from the banquet table, either because she is enchanted or simply very hungry, the Pale Man starts to move. He does so in small, jerky movements, originating from his hands, moving to his head and finally to his body as he gasps for air to display his reanimation. By the time he finally inserts his eyeballs into his hands, stands up, and raises them to his head, we become increasingly uneasy at the danger this poses to Ofelia as she is looking the other way and unaware of the developing situation.

Standing, the terrifying and stunning costume becomes completely visible. Animatronics company DDT Efectos Especiales created arguably the most unforgettable character of the film due to its originality in design and skilled execution. Here the actor’s choice of an unnatural asymmetrical stance and sporadic movements reinforce the otherworldly nature of the creature. Emphasizing this inhuman feeling is the use of green screen panels to facilitate removing a mass of his legs which otherwise seems necessary for his ability to walk (Jones). Witnessing the horror of the fairies’ demise, Ofelia’s expression changes to that of terror as she runs towards the exit only to discover it is too late. To contrast this and again heighten the suspense, the Pale Man’s advancement is unbearably slow and steady as Ofelia nervously fumbles with her chalk. Timed perfectly up until the last moment, the audience is unsure if Ofelia will even escape with her life in this most ill-fated of circumstances.

The second scene of interest is when Captain Vidal manages to perform stitching to his own face. Sweat pouring down his brow and grimacing in reaction to the penetration of the needle, we can almost feel Vidal’s pain. He again contorts his face to the sting of the alcohol, but this does not deter him in pouring another cup. This unsettling scene paints Vidal as an unstoppable and masochistic villain, similar to the Pale Man in that regard. The costume, before extremely neat, ironed and buttoned, is now shabbily worn open with stains of blood and dirt. His movements are calculated and mechanical bordering on obsessive, as he methodically goes about his task. Noticing every little detail, he spots the chalk and picks up his gun to ready himself against an intruder. His expression changes to that of confusion and worry.

In relation to the previous scene, Ofelia is again situated in a location of extreme peril if she is discovered to be trespassing. Speaking is set to a minimum in both scenes so the expressive acting styles of these two characters are highlighted and made more important. This is the scene in which the most obvious clue is left to answer the question about the validity of the fantasy world. The improbability of Ofelia being able to escape from a locked and guarded attic room leads the audience to conclude she used the chalk to build another door. Finally, Vidal’s recognition of this item, which was given to Ofelia by the Faun, adds evidence to the mystery. A subtle detail, when illuminated, helps the pieces to fall together.

Pan’s Labyrinth neither concludes with another concrete example of the fantasy world existing, nor shows anyone besides Ofelia knowing of its existence. By the way Toro does not spell out the answer so clearly, he leaves it open-ended for us to form our own conclusions. We may ask ourselves, how much does it matter whether or not it is real? Would the story be more or less powerful either way? The ending is what we make of it. Non-believers can be satisfied with the film just ending with the brutal one-dimensional villain Vidal is set to justice. Others, who believe in the fantasy world are comforted by the fact that she reaches a state of joy after passing on and is rewarded for sacrificing herself for her brother.

Works Cited

Jones, Doug. Commentary: BEHIND THE SCENES GALLERY: The Pale Man. Picturehouse, 1985. <www.panslabyrinth.com>

Pan’s Labyrinth. Director’s Commentary: Guillermo del Toro. Picturehouse, 2006.

Pan’s Labyrinth. Writ. / Dir. : —. Picturehouse, 2006.


Final Note:  I just discovered an interesting site analyzing the mythology and symbolism used in the movie in-depth is a post at Vigilant Citizen: http://vigilantcitizen.com/?p=5019

MHIS: Reading the Screen

November 12, 2007

Dramatic Costuming and Acting
Heighten the Story in Pan’s Labyrinth

Pan’s Labyrinth is a stunning film which not only contributes originality to the genre of fantasy but also uses dramatic and memorable imagery to convey its story. In the history of cinema, fairytale movies have been traditionally light in terms of portraying characters as overtly frightening or violent. Viewers used to these conventions of the genre will find the use of horrifying imagery in this film shocking. However, traditional fables and legends told to children in the past few centuries have been not been so sanitized. Their purpose was to instill caution and fear into children to prevent them from potential harm. For example, some tales would depict lake monsters that would grab and pull children into the depths and devour them. This was to keep children from carelessly playing around the water and drowning. Tales of forest monsters and witches, such as the well known fable Hansel and Gretel, were told to keep children from straying too far into the forest to potentially get lost or even killed by a wild animal.

A prevalent theme throughout this film is the constant interspersion of the real world and the fantasy. The filmmaker, Guillermo del Toro, juxtaposes scenes of the horrific reality of his character Ofelia’s new surroundings with the equally as frightening scenes of fantasy. This leads the audience to question if the fantasy world is real or not. We may ponder, is the world simply manifested in Sophia’s mind to cope with her mother’s condition and her new stepfather’s cruelty? Or is she indeed a princess, who at the end finds safety and happiness in her kingdom? In an attempt to reveal these answers, a couple of memorable scenes in Pan’s Labyrinth will be analyzed in terms of the arresting costuming design and acting.

The first scene of analysis is one where Ofelia sets out on her mission to obtain the knife in the Pale Man’s den. Dressed in pajamas, a sleeping robe and slippers with her short girlish wavy hair set back in clips, she embodies the innocence of youth. Yet we wonder if what she is wearing in this scene signifies that she is dreaming of the event. With an expression of quiet determination that contrasts her previous shy nature, she wanders through the tunnel towards the frightening monster. The cool green tone of Ofelia’s outfit sets her apart from the scene and the Pale Man. A motif throughout the film, the fantasy world mainly consists of a warm colour palette. (Toro)

Surprisingly, she first looks at him not out of fear but with an expression of curiosity as she examines his eyeballs on the platter, the explicit mural on the wall detailing his nature and the pile of shoes of the deceased. While she is searching for the knife, the Pale Man continues to sits there in the background, inert. This lack of movement increases the tension and suspense of the scene. After Ofelia inevitably is tempted to eat a fruit from the banquet table, either because she is enchanted or simply very hungry, the Pale Man starts to move. He does so in small, jerky movements, originating from his hands, moving to his head and finally to his body as he gasps for air to display his reanimation. By the time he finally inserts his eyeballs into his hands, stands up, and raises them to his head, we become increasingly uneasy at the danger this poses to Ofelia as she is looking the other way and unaware of the developing situation.

Standing, the terrifying and stunning costume becomes completely visible. Animatronics company DDT Efectos Especiales created arguably the most unforgettable character of the film due to its originality in design and skilled execution. Here the actor’s choice of an unnatural asymmetrical stance and sporadic movements reinforce the otherworldly nature of the creature. Emphasizing this inhuman feeling is the use of green screen panels to facilitate removing a mass of his legs which otherwise seems necessary for his ability to walk. (Jones) Witnessing the horror of the fairies’ demise, Ofelia’s expression changes to that of terror as she runs towards the exit only to discover it is too late. To contrast this and again heighten the suspense, the Pale Man’s advancement is unbearably slow and steady as Ofelia nervously fumbles with her chalk. Timed perfectly up until the last moment, the audience is unsure if Ofelia will even escape with her life in this most ill-fated of circumstances.

The second scene of interest is when Captain Vidal manages to perform stitching to his own face. Sweat pouring down his brow and grimacing in reaction to the penetration of the needle, we can almost feel Vidal’s pain. He again contorts his face to the sting of the alcohol, but this does not deter him in pouring another cup. This unsettling scene paints Vidal as an unstoppable and masochistic villain, similar to the Pale Man in that regard. The costume, before extremely neat, ironed and buttoned, is now shabbily worn open with stains of blood and dirt. His movements are calculated and mechanical bordering on obsessive, as he methodically goes about his task. Noticing every little detail, he spots the chalk and picks up his gun to ready himself against an intruder. His expression changes to that of confusion and worry.

In relation to the previous scene, Ofelia is again situated in a location of extreme peril if she is discovered to be trespassing. Speaking is set to a minimum in both scenes so the expressive acting styles of these two characters are highlighted and made more important. This is the scene in which the most obvious clue is left to answer the question about the validity of the fantasy world. The improbability of Ofelia being able to escape from a locked and guarded attic room leads the audience to conclude she used the chalk to build another door. Finally, Vidal’s recognition of this item, which was given to Ofelia by the Faun, adds evidence to the mystery. A subtle detail, when illuminated, helps the pieces to fall together.

Pan’s Labyrinth neither concludes with another concrete example of the fantasy world existing, nor shows anyone besides Ofelia knowing of its existence. By the way Toro does not spell out the answer so clearly, he leaves it open-ended for us to form our own conclusions. We may ask ourselves, how much does it matter whether or not it is real? Would the story be more or less powerful either way? The ending is what we make of it. Non-believers can be satisfied with the film just ending with the brutal one-dimensional villain Vidal is set to justice. Others, who believe in the fantasy world are comforted by the fact that she reaches a state of joy after passing on and is rewarded for sacrificing herself for her brother.

Works Cited

Jones, Doug. Commentary: BEHIND THE SCENES GALLERY: The Pale Man. Picturehouse,

1985. <www.panslabyrinth.com>

Pan’s Labyrinth. Director’s Commentary: Guillermo del Toro. Picturehouse, 2006.

Pan’s Labyrinth. Writ. / Dir. : —. Picturehouse, 2006.

Tags: , , , ,

Short Animated Logo

Logo Animation from Kara Miranda Lawrence on Vimeo.

Above is a short animated logo. Client provided small rasterized image so it was recreated in Adobe Illustrator and then animated in After Effects.

Tags: , , , ,

« Newer Posts